| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 517 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Yogesh Parmar vs Lahoti Terra Knitfab Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 415288]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Jay-Kanan Build Con (P) Ltd. vs O. L. for Omex Investors Ltd. (In Liquidation) (No. 2)
Auction sale: Offer to purchase withdrawn subsequently-Cheque towards EMD dishonoured, Court proceedings treated causally, Direction not to participate directly or indirectly in any auction proceedings before the court-The high court, by the impugned order, had directed initiation of proceedings against the appellant and its director for perjury and also directed the [LexDoc Id : 409920]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Gunvantbhai J. Aghara and Ors. vs Super Cast Alloy Foundries (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414756]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Surendra Kumar Dalmia vs Suryaa Sponge Iron Ltd. and Ors.
Time as essence of contract: No presumption about extension of time or presumed acceptance of renewed date-Extension of time to be in categorical terms-Where time was of the essence of the contract, no question of there being any presumption about extension of time or presumed acceptance of a renewed [LexDoc Id : 424412]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2010 |
Vipulkumar Dahyalal Bheda vs V.S. Cosmopharma (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 447697]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Vipulkumar Dahyalal Bheda vs V.S. Cosmopharma (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 425020]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Vipulkumar Dahyalal Bheda vs V.S. Cosmopharma (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 416474]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Knowledge Infrastructure Systems (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs Maharashtra Power Generation Co. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400520]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Ajaybhai Sureshchandra Bhatia vs Vikram Silk Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 415286]
|
CLB |
2010 |
S.M. Patel Iron Traders (P) Ltd. vs Sugam Construction (P) Ltd.
Summary jurisdiction of company court-Company court not competent to try triable issues in summary jurisdiction-The company court in its summary jurisdiction was not competent to try triable issues. All that it could see was whether the company sought to be woun [LexDoc Id : 409847]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs Hermonite Associates Ltd. and Anr.
Winding up petition: Failure to serve notice on advocates of company-Failure not amounting to fraud-Failure to serve notice on the advocates of the respondent appearing before the DRT would not amount to fraud. It might have been advisable and pruden [LexDoc Id : 402932]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Ram Saroop Nadkarni vs Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and Ors.
Request for issuance of duplicate share certificates: Suit filed for non-transfer of shares dismissed as barred under s.10 and s.113-Details sought by company furnished by plaintiff, CLB to make necessary rectification in the Register of members, No perversity in judgment dismissing suit-The plaintiff had purchased certain shares of the defendant-company. However, the shares were stolen and the plaintiff requested the company for dupli [LexDoc Id : 409935]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Panchvati Estates (P) Ltd., In re and Super Mart Two Property Management Services (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 400343]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Jindal Earthmovers (P) Ltd., In re and Jindal Infrastructure (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 400335]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Gopi Nath Das vs OL and Anr.
Dheklapara Tea Co. Ltd. (In Liquidation), In re
Application by Central Government to take over the company-Stage by stage progress of Central Government contemplated-A tea company was ordered to be wound up and the OL took possession of its assets and other properties. Pursuant to the direction of the Supreme Court [LexDoc Id : 407159]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2010 |
New Cawnpore Flour Mills vs Bakemans Industries (P) Ltd.
Winding up: Sale of companys property-Buyer entitled to interest only on entire auction price-The respondent had availed loan from SICOM. Since the respondent defaulted in repayment SICOM took over its possession. In a petition filed by the cre [LexDoc Id : 403835]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
North East Pure Drinks (P) Ltd., In re and Varun Beverages International Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 400341]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Doosan Babcock Engg. and Services India (P) Ltd., In re and Doosan Projects India (P) Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Approval to scheme by all shareholders of transferor and transferee companies, Objection raised by Regional Director overruled, Scheme sanctioned-The transferor-companies and transferee-company had sought for sanction to their scheme of amalgamation. Meetings of shareholders were dispensed with. [LexDoc Id : 400213]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Flextronics Technologies India (P) Ltd., In re
Scheme of arrangement or amalgamation: Sanction of court-No reduction in share capital by virtue of amalgamation, Cash flow statement not depicting financial instability of transferee company, Sole objector having other remedies, Scheme approved-Three transferor companies were proposed to merge with the petitioner-transferee company as per a scheme of arrangement. The board of directors of the [LexDoc Id : 409936]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
R.H. Patel and Ors. vs Reliance Industries Ltd.
Territorial jurisdiction-Relief claimed against transferee company-The high court, considering whether the application seeking to restrain RIL from operating or implementing office memorandum reducing superannuation a [LexDoc Id : 407160]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs Coventry Coil-O-Matic Haryana Ltd. and Anr.
Coventry Coil-O-Matic Haryana Ltd. and Anr. vs RBI and Ors.
Winding up: Circumstances in which company might be wound up by court-Failure to discharge admitted liabilities-The respondent had submitted a proposal for term loan for starting a manufacturing unit. The sanction was granted for the financial assistance with pa [LexDoc Id : 400077]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Lemon Exim (P) Ltd., In re and Vinton Healthcare Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 400001]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
N.R. Harikumar vs W.W. Apparels India (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414754]
|
CLB |
2010 |
RPG Cables Ltd. vs Logic Eastern India (P) Ltd.
Winding up: Inability to pay debts-Both parties not regarding time schedule as binding and essence of contract-The petitioner and the respondent had entered into an agreement whereby the latter was to develop the equipment, including software, mentioned in the [LexDoc Id : 403550]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Suresh Kumar Agrawal vs R and R Consortium (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Maintainability of appeal to high court: Appeal against order of CLB-Finding of fact duly supported by material on record not open to be re-appreciated-In the present appeal, it was not the case that the observations and findings recorded by the CLB under order impugned were against law or based on ir [LexDoc Id : 421625]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2010 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
